Have you tried any tests yet? It would be very helpful to see different measurements from different people to see how the File API is being used (or how people would like to use the File API).
Ikai Lan Developer Programs Engineer, Google App Engine Blog: http://googleappengine.blogspot.com Twitter: http://twitter.com/app_engine Reddit: http://www.reddit.com/r/appengine On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Fabs <lord.f...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all > > I currently have an app running which stores 16MB binary files by > having a list of keys, and a number of 'data' entities storing the > data. This has good performance with the new async datastore APIs. I > am interested to know if the files API will match the performance of a > number of asynchronous datastore reads, or if the files API will have > additional latency. > > I realise the files API is experimental and should not be used in > production yet, but it seems like it will be a more robust solution to > my problem. > > Regards. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
