lol On Apr 7, 8:46 am, Sudhir <sudhi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I think this is trolling. > > I think the easiest and most efficient way to solve the problems he's > facing is to block all IPs that match the 0.0.0.0 mask, and also > blacklist all user agents that have length > 0. Should work like a > charm. > > Sudhir > > On Apr 7, 4:42 am, JH <jamesthop...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > trolling? > > > On Apr 6, 3:51 am, Álvaro Degives-Más <adegives...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > In my case, I have both; the API isn't one particularly apt for user > > > authentication (i.e. I'm not looking at limiting users to a somehow > > > pre-accredited group) but more for *validation*, in a more or less trivial > > > sense. The thing is, as I'm essentially seeing that "trivial" doesn't > > > exist, > > > the API is going to be axed, even though I was trying to avoid that. > > > > As to the scraping issue, you're quite right; the solution is a walled > > > garden. Even so, the "big three" are fingerprinted so as to exclude non-SE > > > access, as well as access to unauthorized bits (fortunately, the "big > > > three" > > > are quite tolerant now toward getting smacked with a 403).
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
