Let's give the GAE team some credit, and assume that they can discern the short-term-fix issues from the long-term-solution issues.
I starred this new idea, because, in the long term, it would be a really amazing toolset to have for my enterprise apps (not my free app, where all I want to do is keep idle instances from running). It also would be a level of load balancing control never before seen in the cloud world, which should get some people at google interested. And I suspect that Brandon would find ways to use it that just blew us away. On Sep 4, 2011, at 7:47 AM, Sergey Schetinin wrote: > Well,.. I intentionally tried to make a suggestion that requires as little > deviation from the existing plan as possible. I have no faith in GAE team > making anything but baby steps towards the community -- that request in the > linked ticket is way too ambitious. > > -Sergey > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/TIcQn3mpRLgJ. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
