Sleep in non-GAE Environments says "Do other things and check back on me in X time"
With instance Hour billing Sleep would only save you money if you have concurrency to handle multiple tasks, and this freed CPU Cycles, AND you weren't sleeping longer than the thing you were waiting to have happen. From: google-appengine@googlegroups.com [mailto:google-appengine@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Gerald Tan Sent: Friday, September 16, 2011 9:51 AM To: google-appengine@googlegroups.com Subject: [google-appengine] Re: API call datastore_v3.Put() required more quota ? >From my experience (at least with Java) I believe sleep() continues to eat cpu time despite the cpu not really doing anything. My cpu times skyrocketed when I used sleep() with long-held http connections to implement http push back before channel api was available. I recommend breaking the work into taskqueue tasks instead. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-appengine/-/vJC56brjHYwJ. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.
