On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:56 PM, Brian Quinlan <bquin...@google.com> wrote:
>
> There is a known bug where the combination of Python 2.7 and enabling
> concurrent requests causes large latency increases. The Python 2.7
> runtime is still experimental and bugs like this are expected.
>

Ok, I understand that.

Greg, could you please let us know why we have the new full-sized instance
hour for python and still not have python concurrent requests ?

I'm asking because you
wrote<http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine/browse_thread/thread/a1bfa432e0c002a7/739169f799d8e69a>
:

Q: Will there be a solution for Python concurrency?  Will this require any
code changes?
Python concurrency will be handled by our release of Python 2.7 on App
Engine.  We’ve heard a lot of feedback from our Python users who are
worried
that the incentive is to move to Java because of its support for concurrent
requests, so we’ve made a change to the new pricing to account for
that.  *While
Python 2.7 support is currently in progress it is not yet done *so we will
be **
providing a half-sized instance for Python (at half the price) until Python
2.7 is released.* *

Ok, I know. It was already released (as experimental), but I thought that
the purpose to holding "full-sized instances" was to give to python users
the concurrent requests.


Thanks

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google App Engine" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine?hl=en.

Reply via email to