Run the equivalent query with the low-level API. If it produces the same unexpected results, it's Google's issue. If it fixes the problem, it's mine. Other than a potential hybridization issue I can't imagine what Objectify could be doing wrong since it's just adding projections to an underlying low-level Query object.
Jeff On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 5:50 PM, NAyAN Jain <gamernaya...@gmail.com> wrote: > No I haven't used the cache annotation but still the cost and datastore > read are same as a normal query. > I am looking for a way to reduce read operations. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/604573fe-8f5b-4763-a742-358eef9f06ca%40googlegroups.com > . > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-appengine+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-appengine/CADK-0uiEKSQykatt0p3cQ%2Bf95d-MZ4Ct-nA-AQFRwvbdhmf0bw%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
