On Mar 9, 6:42 pm, Sink <[email protected]> wrote: > Turns out that the Description field was put into the > Content.Content field > and then ignored/trashed/disgarded, hence it was not being returned > So, the description is actually in the content field and easily > changed .
good news. as i said, description should be atom:content with type text. all the underlying attributes are xml regardless of client-api. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Base Data API" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Base-data-API?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
