Hi there, I think it's not only "an advantage", but a huge security hole. What if Jim at some point invites a third developer. The new developer could update the file with some malicious version and it will go live immediately. Alternatively, Jim may want to implement the reporting feature to track down that offending web site.
I think this distribution "feature" is really cool if google can make it immutable. The released library shouldn't change w/o version change. In the end, the browsers should really cache and pre-compile any such javascript library. Alex. On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, mm w <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > for my concern, even if it's not a big deal, this behaviour is > disrespectful, but it has an advantage: you've just created an > auto-universal-worldweb updater :) > > Best, > > -mmw > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hosting at Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
