Hi Alexander, security, boah.. , if Jim may want to be evil with his clients, he could transform all their websites unto porn websites LOL
Best, -mmw On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Alexander Sorokin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi there, > > I think it's not only "an advantage", but a huge security hole. What > if Jim at some point invites a third developer. The new developer > could update the file with some malicious version and it will go live > immediately. Alternatively, Jim may want to implement the reporting > feature to track down that offending web site. > > I think this distribution "feature" is really cool if google can make > it immutable. The released library shouldn't change w/o version > change. In the end, the browsers should really cache and pre-compile > any such javascript library. > > Alex. > > On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 9:36 PM, mm w <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> for my concern, even if it's not a big deal, this behaviour is >> disrespectful, but it has an advantage: you've just created an >> auto-universal-worldweb updater :) >> >> Best, >> >> -mmw >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Hosting at Google Code" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-code-hosting?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
