When I was learning C++, I used this reference site a lot (still use):

http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/algorithm/

I believe the most important to learn are STL algorithms and containers.

P.S. I can link to other sites right?

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:09 PM, blue
lightning<blue.lightning.thun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Cheng Li,
> Thanks for the explanation.. I am curious about C++ STL, I have heard
> about it
> but I haven't explored it yet. Any ideas where I can start learning
> about this STL?
>
> Thanks
> Blue Lightning
>
> On Sep 6, 12:33 pm, Cheng Li <musicl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Things is C++ is more efficient to solve these algorithm problems,  and C++
>> is short. Actually, most people in the top use C-style code in C++. I think
>> they want to take advantage of C++ STL although STL is not necessary for
>> qualificaiton round.   But C++ STL is very useful sometime. Only mine mind.
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 8:40 AM, blue lightning <
>>
>> blue.lightning.thun...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi all, I am new to this competition.
>> > I was using java to solve the qualification problems. After the
>> > qualification round ended, I downloaded some of the top scorer source
>> > code, and it looks like most of them are using c++. And their source
>> > code is extremely short. This may be a noob question, but I am
>> > wondering how can you write the solution in such a short codes, and is
>> > there some advantages with using c++?
>>
>> > thanks,
>> > blue lightning
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>>                                         Cheng Li
> >
>



-- 
Piva

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-codejam" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-code@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-code+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-code?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to