On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 01:32, Bob Lee <crazy...@crazybob.org> wrote: > I assume you're talking about circular deps between constructors. This is a > tough problem. Injecting proxies was an experiment that I don't really like > to advertise.
Good! But as a user of your tool, one will most certainly be bitten by them at some point, so you will learn about them - the hard way. > In the long run, I think the best solution will be to > generate an error when we encounter a circular dep. The solution to the > error will be to inject a Provider<X> into one of the constructors or to > move the dep into an injected method instead (not currently supported). Hear, hear!! I never liked those proxies, and one have no idea of them existing until one suddenly get an error about accessing such a proxy. They are not stable either, so those proxy-problems kinda come and go with module-configuration changes. And amazingly, they cannot be resolved by making a setter (what about field-injection?). Is this 3.0 stuff? Endre. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to google-guice@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-guice+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
