On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for your support, Jesse. I guess I forgot the context of assisted > inject being an extension. > > As it is now, I guess the best workaround is to build assistedinject with > the patch, and publish it to maven somewhere. It is a lot cleaner then > working around it, even if subject to change. > > I hope I didn't distract you guys too much from new development. The new > constructor injection of 2.1 is awesome! > I think Jesse just meant if you are willing to dig around and add the functionality before either of us gets to it, that would be awesome! We're always happy when our users are happy =) Dhanji. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "google-guice" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
