I see, Dhanji.  Well, there is a patch listed in the issue.  As far as I can
tell, it has gone through some review and will work.  So, if you want to
give me commit rights ... ;)

Cheers,
-Adrian

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Dhanji R. Prasanna <[email protected]>wrote:

>
>
> On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your support, Jesse.  I guess I forgot the context of assisted
>> inject being an extension.
>>
>> As it is now, I guess the best workaround is to build assistedinject with
>> the patch, and publish it to maven somewhere.  It is a lot cleaner then
>> working around it, even if subject to change.
>>
>> I hope I didn't distract you guys too much from new development.  The new
>> constructor injection of 2.1 is awesome!
>>
>
> I think Jesse just meant if you are willing to dig around and add the
> functionality before either of us gets to it, that would be awesome!
>
> We're always happy when our users are happy =)
>
> Dhanji.
>
>
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"google-guice" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-guice?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to