Amazing - and yet there are serious applications of Linux which includes the hosting of operating systems - including Windows operating systems.
Tell me, would you simply prefer not to have the option to do something if it isn't absolutely perfect for you? This would mean that you shouldn't be using Compiz, which is actually less stable than Picasa on linux ? And I'm sure that Firefox would be out of the window for not honouring the GTK principles - it's menu doesn't sit well with the Linux environment. Of course, you being serious, and keen to keep Google out of Linux, will be busy coding your alternative software which I'm confident will offer the same functions. On Nov 18, 2:12 am, mniedero <[email protected]> wrote: > Not everything that is (technically) possible makes sense or is a good > idea. > > Picasa? I deleted and banned Picasa from my computers and I will never > install Picasa again with one exception: Picasa has become a true > native Linux application! > I am a serious Linux user and I am not interested in wined Windows > software and/or .NET applications under Linux using Mono-framework or > whatever else! If I want to use Windows software I let it run in a > Windows VM within VMware on a Linux host OS. > > If a company isn't willing to write native Linux applications it must > decide between two ways to go: 1) give the software to the Open Source > community 2) let it be! > > For about more than 20 years now I am an experienced Microsoft/Windows > user and I am tired, really tired to use Windows software any longer! > > On Nov 13, 7:25 am, yegle <[email protected]> wrote: -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google-Labs-Picasa-for-Linux" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-picasa-for-linux?hl=en.
