Actually one has to compare apples to apples. Picasa's competition is other online photo album sites <ie> Flickr.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Ed <[email protected]> wrote: > Picasa is less popular with the general public for the same reason > that Windows is more popular than Linux. Every computer comes with a > "free" operating system (Windows) and every new camera comes with > "free" photo management software ( Consumers are used to always > inserting any CD that comes with any purchased hardware) - plus, and > even easier, Windows includes their "free" product "Windows Photo > Gallery", with NO installation necessary. John Doe consumer just wants > the simple or pre-installed solution and doesn't want to bother with > the hassle of downloading Picassa, even if they have heard of Picassa, > which most consumers have not heard of. > > On Feb 25, 9:39 am, Stephen <[email protected]> wrote: > > Arguably all these examples have a larger user base than Picasa. Picasa > > doesn't seem to have the uptake that say Google Earth or Google-Chrome > have. > > Not sure why ... > > > ... > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google-Labs-Picasa-for-Linux" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-picasa-for-linux?hl=en. > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google-Labs-Picasa-for-Linux" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-labs-picasa-for-linux?hl=en.
