You are probably right. The search does clearly answer 50 percent- or
even more of the questions with past posts. But it does not matter as
long as it do not answer the "one- last percentage" that is needed for
the none javascript people (like me).
In stead of reading "page up" and "page down" about javascript- and
then use hours- days and probably weeks and months understanding a
language that are _totally_ unknown for me; i picked up the phone and
got someone to do the last bit for me. My hours are worth so much more
than the (about) $40 i had to pay to finish the code- and it was done
in an hour or so.
The "geez, go to Google" answers are not helping _anyone_ the way i
see it. Answers like that are- (in lack of words-) useless and
"utterly arrogant" (read: stupid) as long as the poster don´t know if
OP actually tried to find the answer any other place before he/she
asked.
Anyway: It took me 30 seconds on the phone, (about) $40 and a few
minutes to copy- and paste the code i got. For me that´s "priceless".
The finished maps are moved to the right place; and i can start doing
what this project _really_ are about.
On Sep 23, 3:44 am, Lance Dyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dont you figure If its called an API you should familiarize yourself
> just a little with the language its for?
>
> Kyrre Baker wrote:
> > Yes. Or go for the better alternative; no. I see that JavaScript
> > writers are so cheap to hire that i don´t even bother when it comes to
> > the rest of this code.
>
> There are web application developers (especially those who specialize in
> mapping applications
> see the personal prejudice in that ) and then there are script
> kiddies..who could learn to use the
> API at your expense.... but will still not contribute much more than
> doing just
> what you ask of them
>
> > But thank you for the URL. I probably would not
> > have found google myself.
>
> You would be surprised how many fail to use the resources readily at hand
> this group has a great search tool on the web front end that would
> answer 50 percent
> or so of the questions with past posts...
>
> > On Sep 23, 2:43 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
>
> >> On Sep 22, 5:13 pm, Kyrre Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>> Thank you.
>
> >>> Sounds like a good idea. But. And there´s a big one. I have _no_ idea
> >>> on how to create- and work with arrays in javascript. In PHP i would
> >>> do it simple like this.
>
> >>> // Adding to array
> >>> foreach (...time the positions are read) {
> >>> if (!in_array($latlon, $array)) {
> >>> $array[] = $latlon;
> >>> }
>
> >>> }
>
> >>> I would probably do it like you recomend if; and only if i knew any
> >>> javascript at all :-/
>
> >> Maybe you should learn
> >> some...http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=gmail&q=javascript%20tutorial
>
> >>> On Sep 23, 1:53 am, Rossko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>>> The question are. Can i, in a not-to-difficult way, make the map
> >>>>> create a polyline from "the last mark"- to "this mark"?
>
> >>>> Shouldn't be difficult.
> >>>> You're already getting the GLatLng() of each point as it comes in, to
> >>>> place your markers.
> >>>> Push each new GLatLng() onto an array
> >>>> If your polyline exists, removeOverlay it.
> >>>> Now re-define the polyline using the points array, and addOverlay it.
>
> >>>> cheers, Ross K- Hide quoted text -
>
> >>> - Show quoted text -
>
> > .
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Maps API" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Maps-API?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
