Hello there,

we're expecting the same error at one of our customers pages.

We generates a key for the domain www.buz-ag.ch (which you'll find in the 
source code of the page):
http://www.buz-ag.ch/metanavigation/kontakt.html

The hack with the v=3.6 parameter doesn't work anymore for us.

Has anyody heard something new about this?

I think it might be a problem of the api console that doesn't update 
Googles cache fast enough (if they acutally have a cache for this).

Thank you for your help!

Greetings

Tizian Schmidlin



On Monday, June 4, 2012 2:51:31 PM UTC+2, Danny Pryor wrote:
>
> Here you go: http://fitnessforumgainesville.com/contact/directions-V3.php. 
>
>
> Realistically, I was only making a comment. I know the code is correct 
> because it's copied and pasted directly from Google, substituting only my 
> key in the code. However, if there is something that I'm missing, I'd sure 
> like to know it. 
>
> Danny Pryor 
> Vice-President 
> Rodan Media Group 
>
> www.rodanmedia.net 
> d...@rodanmedia.net 
>
> PO Box 30136 
> Fort Lauderdale, FL 
> 33303 
>
> T | 954-561-0600 
> F | 954-333-6345 
>
> On Jun 4, 2012, at 6:30 AM, Andrew Leach wrote: 
>
> > On 2 June 2012 05:24, Danny Pryor <d...@rodanmedia.net> wrote: 
> >> This issue seems to persist. We have a site we put together for a 
> client in 
> >> Georgia, and we also use the same code for a domain in Florida. The 
> Florida 
> >> test domain is working just fine, but the exact same code on the 
> Georgia 
> >> site does not, even though both domains are authorized, e.g.: 
> >> *.example.com/* and *.example2.com/*. What I suspect with the Georgia 
> site, 
> >> fitnessforumgainesville.com, is that we just threw the switch on a new 
> DNS, 
> >> and the domain is presently repropagating around the web.  However, I 
> won't 
> >> know that for certain unless someone shoots down that theory (I'm not 
> >> certain that issue would even affect Google's read in anyway, as the 
> correct 
> >> code is loaded on both servers) or until I know the propagation is 
> >> absolutely concluded. 
> >> 
> >> Either way, this issue is one that I was able to duplicate on the 
> Florida 
> >> domain, then rectify later by reverting the code. Nothing I have been 
> able 
> >> to do fixes the problem on the Georgia domain, so I'm at a loss. If any 
> new 
> >> ideas have materialized since the last posts, prior to mine, I'd be 
> quite 
> >> grateful to hear some ideas. 
> > 
> > One idea is to give real urls which demonstrate the problem. There's 
> > nothing above which anyone can use to help -- what's particularly 
> > frustrating is having rooted around on the one real domain you quote, 
> > I find that you've removed the map code entirely. 
> > 
> > -- 
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
> Groups "Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group. 
> > To post to this group, send email to 
> google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com. 
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. 
> > For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en. 
> > 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Maps JavaScript API v3" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-maps-js-api-v3/-/7UaO33DcS9QJ.
To post to this group, send email to google-maps-js-api-v3@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-maps-js-api-v3+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-maps-js-api-v3?hl=en.

Reply via email to