Sorry for the duplicate posting, but on my side it didn't seem to take the first time.
On Sep 15, 9:24 am, robin <robinbo...@googlemail.com> wrote: > We just had a meeting here in Cambridge (UK) yesterday about the > future of academic networks and, aside from the usual academic > response to build our own weaker versions of apps, the consensus at > the end was basically something very like Google Waves. I think that > the academic community will take to Google Waves like a duck to water, > but there will definitely be a need to have it indexed and searchable. > This is especially true as the academic, and even the cultural, sector > will want their own wave servers. > > On Sep 14, 8:52 am, "Jerry N." <torm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > @soundlinker > > > So itsnt there a possibility to designate a Wave as public? So that > > one does not have to get invited to see or even edit the wave? But Im > > not sure if IFrames are indexed.. > > > On Sep 11, 3:21 am, soundlinker <soundlin...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If the spider crawls the src of the iframe it would get the content. > > > As long as the spider has the credentials to read the contents of the > > > wave. > > > > On Sep 11, 12:25 am, Jason Salas <digitalpontificat...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > That's an interesting take...and would certainly get the job done for > > > > servers we can directly manage...but for those using the Google-hosted > > > > Wave server, beyond our control. Hmm... > > > > > Jason :) > > > > jasonsa...@wavesandbox.com > > > > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:40 AM, redthor <douglas.re...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > I'm wondering if you could just stick a robots.txt file on the website > > > > > and decide for yourself? > > > > > > On Sep 9, 9:24 am, Jason Salas <digitalpontificat...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >> Hi Adam, > > > > > >> Is the content in an IFRAME necessarily indexed? That's always been > > > > >> a > > > > >> gray area for me. > > > > > >> On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 3:43 AM, > > > > >> Adam<adamiandoughe...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > Surely the fact we can embed waves into websites means a wave can > > > > >> > be > > > > >> > indexed... *in a way* - Not it's purest form. > > > > > >> > On Sep 7, 10:20 pm, Jason Salas <digitalpontificat...@gmail.com> > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> Hi everyone, > > > > > >> >> Here's something I thought about last night in the car as my > > > > >> >> technical > > > > >> >> marketing side took hold...since at the moment waves are > > > > >> >> "published" > > > > >> >> to the public Web, I think we can assume that their contained > > > > >> >> content > > > > >> >> is NOT spidered/indexed by Google Search. But on the contrary, > > > > >> >> what > > > > >> >> are the opportunities down the road for those who choose to run > > > > >> >> their > > > > >> >> own wave servers and actually have their data be listed for > > > > >> >> searches > > > > >> >> (i.e., educators, government agencies, marketing firms)? > > > > > >> >> Will/should we be able to toggle the ability for Wave content to > > > > >> >> be > > > > >> >> discovered and regenerated in perpetuity (like Twitter), or have > > > > >> >> such > > > > >> >> data be hands-off, being inherently messaging of a privileged > > > > >> >> nature > > > > >> >> (like Facebook)? > > > > > >> >> Thought? > > > > > >> >> Jason :) > > > > >> >> jasonsa...@wavesandbox.com- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to google-wave-api@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
