Ah, my apologies, for some reason, I started talking about the conversation model and server-server communication lines.
On Nov 18, 2:21 pm, David Nesting <da...@fastolfe.net> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 7:15 PM, Olreich <olre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > interface was completely in the terminal). But first, the Wave > > protocol will probably need to be completed or at least relatively > > stable, so that a new version does not need to come out every few > > days. > > > Google, of course, will not do this. The reason why is that Google has > > Even assuming I bought into this theory (which I don't), Wave is designed to > federate among other types of servers. What you're asking for here is a > standard API for front-ends to talk to Google's implementation of Wave. Not > having this does not preclude you coming up with a standard API for > front-ends to talk to anyone else's implementation, which can in turn talk > to Google's (via federation). > > David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Wave API" group. To post to this group, send email to google-wave-...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-wave-api+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-wave-api?hl=en.
