Sorry, typo. See correction below. On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Bruce Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose instead of allow <set-property> to have a "values" attribute as a > mutually-exclusive alternative to the "value" attribute: > I propose instead to allow <set-property> to have a "values" attribute... (ditto above) --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
