That's right, and you can be sure I'll check the next version number. Anyway, we still can use Jboss-like versionning : 1.6.0.final or 1.6.0.GA
On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:58 AM, Ray Cromwell <cromwell...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Well, maybe the GWT guys can offer some guidance on how they plan to > number 1.6 milestone releases. My only further comment is that there > is no reason why maven repo versions have to match GWT versions. I've > seen GWT artifacts named -rc1 in some maven repos. The GWT team > doesn't officially support maven, so the maven community is really > free to choose their own conventions. If future 1.6 releases have > different versions, great, but if future 1.6 builds remain 1.6.0 I > think they'll be trouble. > > Certainly, if you look at the final versions of GWT 1.3 and 1.4 > there's room for hope, since the minor version on those went quite > high before release. > > -Ray > > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:53 AM, nicolas de loof > <nicolas.del...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Please note 1.5.x history at > > > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=4&q=&colspec=Filename+Summary+Uploaded+Size+DownloadCount > > 1.5.0 was RC1 > > 1.5.1 was RC2 > > GWT-1.5 final is 1.5.2 ! > > > > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:50 AM, nicolas de loof < > nicolas.del...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> I'm not responsible of the way google guys name there jars ! > >> Anyway I'm not sure you can publish same jar name at googlecode. > >> > >> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Ray Cromwell <cromwell...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> Yes, but when M2, M3, RC1, etc are released, all with version 1.6.0, > >>> it will make it hard for someone to discern just which version is > >>> actually in the repo unless one makes assumptions about timestamps in > >>> the repo. It just seems like it'll be a future problem to me. > >>> > >>> > >>> -Ray > >>> > >>> On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 12:32 AM, nicolas de loof > >>> <nicolas.del...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > This is the version number used by gwt guys themself : > >>> > > >>> > > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/downloads/list?can=1&q=1.6.0 > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > On Sat, Feb 7, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Ray Cromwell <cromwell...@gmail.com> > >>> > wrote: > >>> >> > >>> >> Should probably use -Dversion=1.6-M1 for that rather than > >>> >> -Dversion=1.6.0 > >>> >> > >>> >> -Ray > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 11:03 PM, nicolas de loof > >>> >> <nicolas.del...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> > Allready there : > >>> >> > http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-dev/1.6.0/ > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Arthur Kalmenson > >>> >> > <arthur.k...@gmail.com> > >>> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Yep, that's what I meant, so if you don't include a version and > let > >>> >> >> Maven pick up the latest version, it'll pick up 1.5-RC1. You can > >>> >> >> also > >>> >> >> see from the size graph that 1.5-RC1 is considered newer then > >>> >> >> 1.5.3. > >>> >> >> This might be a problem for some people. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> P.S. Will 1.6-M1 hit central or will it be just the final > release? > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> -- > >>> >> >> Arthur Kalmenson > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:57 AM, nicolas de loof > >>> >> >> <nicolas.del...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >> >> > AFAIK, mvnrepository "latest" is based on textual version > >>> >> >> > comparison, > >>> >> >> > so > >>> >> >> > 1.5-RC* > 1.5.3 > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM, nicolas de loof > >>> >> >> > <nicolas.del...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> > wrote: > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> What make you say ths is the default one ? > >>> >> >> >> Index of /maven2/com/google/gwt/gwt-user/ > >>> >> >> >> ../ > >>> >> >> >> 1.4.60/ 17-Sep-2007 > >>> >> >> >> 17:57 > >>> >> >> >> - > >>> >> >> >> 1.4.62/ 23-Mar-2008 > >>> >> >> >> 09:10 > >>> >> >> >> - > >>> >> >> >> 1.5-M1/ 01-Apr-2008 > >>> >> >> >> 10:29 > >>> >> >> >> - > >>> >> >> >> 1.5-M2/ 13-May-2008 > >>> >> >> >> 13:20 > >>> >> >> >> - > >>> >> >> >> 1.5-RC1/ 29-May-2008 > >>> >> >> >> 10:40 > >>> >> >> >> - > >>> >> >> >> 1.5.1/ 11-Aug-2008 > >>> >> >> >> 08:35 > >>> >> >> >> - > >>> >> >> >> 1.5.2/ 01-Sep-2008 > >>> >> >> >> 11:59 > >>> >> >> >> - > >>> >> >> >> 1.5.3/ 20-Oct-2008 > >>> >> >> >> 14:19 > >>> >> >> >> - > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> As there is no metadata.xml file, there is no default ! > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> >> PS : I'm the guy who uploads those artifacts > >>> >> >> >> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Arthur Kalmenson > >>> >> >> >> <arthur.k...@gmail.com> > >>> >> >> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> Hello everyone, > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> I'm not sure who rsyncs GWT releases to Maven central, but if > >>> >> >> >>> you > >>> >> >> >>> look > >>> >> >> >>> at: > http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.gwt/gwt-user > >>> >> >> >>> you > >>> >> >> >>> can > >>> >> >> >>> see that the default GWT version is 1.5-RC1 and not 1.5.3. > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> -- > >>> >> >> >>> Arthur Kalmenson > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >>> > >>> >> >> >> > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > > > >>> >> >> > > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
