On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote: > Yes, please, please, please make this instance based. Every serious app I've > seen winds up creating its own interface to wrap around our static calls to > make them testable (and the ones on commands in particular), and it's > generally a painful retrofit. It also becomes a real difficultly for those > writing test runners.
The current version of the patch is instance-based. I assume it's ok to have Scheduler be an abstract base class? -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
