As Sven said, I'm very interested in deRPC. Thumbs up!
Regards, Mark Gördes On 19 Okt., 22:56, Sven Brunken <s...@extjs.com> wrote: > I also vote for deRPC. I am already using it in many places without > any problems. It has even less problems because of the missing "script > took too long" warning. > > I run into one problem so far and that was already listed > here:http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit-contributors/browse... > > And what I can say, Mark will also vote for it ;) > We worked together to find the real exception that is occurring in the > posted example (stack overflow due to infinite loop) > > Sven Brunken > > On 19 Okt., 22:28, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote: > > > Love the enthusiasm! > > Anyone else? > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Sami Jaber <sami.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > IMHO, It would be a mistake not to make it happen for GWT 2 > > > > deRPC is a huge step forward in terms of performance, extensibility, > > > command sinking, serialization extensibility, security and so forth > > > Everybody know that GWT 2 will introduce new API and many new > > > functionalities, why deRPC would not be part of the show? > > > Because it has not been intensively tested ? There's probably a lack of > > > tests cases, sure, but it is not specific to deRPC. When I see the last > > > commit streams, deRPC seems to me more reliable than other APIs. And > > > regarding the migration path and the different use case scenarios, this is > > > sweet. If you want to stay in legacy land, just use the straight > > > RemoteServiceServlet class. If you want to support the two modes, just > > > inherits from HybridServiceServlet (as JUnitHostImpl does in the trunk > > > right > > > now). If you are a newcomer, forget all the old non-extensible interfaces > > > and use RpcServlet and RpcService. > > > > Releasing deRPC does not mean that you won't be able to patch if later. > > > Earlier it will be released, earlier you will get feedback. Please think > > > about it. > > > > My 2 french euros, > > > > Sami > > > > On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote: > > > >> So, here's the deal on deRPC. It doesn't yet have the miles on it that > > >> we'd like, so we're pretty much on the fence as to whether to really > > >> ship it > > >> in GWT 2.0 or not. > > >> It has been included in MS1 and will be in MS2, but we may still make a > > >> "no go" decision before the GWT 2.0 RC comes out. > > > >> If you (as in, anyone reading this email) have tried the new RPC stuff > > >> and > > >> have feedback, now would be the right time to give it a thumbs up or > > >> thumbs > > >> down. At the moment, we're leaning thumbs down -- mainly to be > > >> conservative. > > > >> -- Bruce > > > >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Sami Jaber <sami.ja...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >>> Following a question I asked privately to Bruce and Amit. > > >>> Thanks for your response gwitters > > > >>> Sami > > > >>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 9:38 PM, Bruce Johnson <br...@google.com> wrote: > > > >>>> Sami, would you mind asking this question directly on the Contributors > > >>>> list? We can answer it so that everyone has a chance to comment. > > >>>> Thanks. > > > >>>>>> On Sat, Oct 17, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Sami Jaber > > >>>>>> <sami.ja...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > >>>>>>> Bruce, > > > >>>>>>> What is the status of deRPC API in GWT 2. The code is in the trunk, > > >>>>>>> it seems to be work very well (at least with my test cases) but > > >>>>>>> nothing in > > >>>>>>> GWT MS1 Amit announce and very few gwtc posts regarding the > > >>>>>>> API/issue. > > >>>>>>> Are you planning to ship deRPC with GWT 2 (I would love to regarding > > >>>>>>> all the JDO/AppEngine integration) ? Similarly, are you planning to > > >>>>>>> update > > >>>>>>> GPE to conform to the new interfaces, RpcService, RpcServlet, etc > > >>>>>>> ... ( > > >>>>>>>http://code.google.com/eclipse/docs/gwt_rpc.html) ? > > > >>>>>>> Thanks for you response, > > > >>>>>>> Sami --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
