Because I also want to include the linenumbers. I hope you are not proposing that I type these in as parameters as well ? ;-)
David On Nov 6, 11:22 am, Miroslav Pokorny <miroslav.poko...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why not just include the class.method name at the start of each and every > message String sent to your logging method...Its a pain but it works. > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 7:06 PM, stuckagain <david.no...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > Would it be possible to implement a Trace mechanism that (when > > enabled) would be able to autodetermine from where it is called > > (classname.method). In plain java I have such a thing implemented in > > my tracing package and it really helps in keeping trace statements > > really simple. > > > In the GWT client I'm using the incubator log API (I also tried out > > gwt-log from Fred), but none of the log/trace packages that exist > > today are able to detect from where they are called to give a better > > output. > > > It looks to me that I will actually need compiler support to be able > > to implement such a thing. > > > I read in this newsgroup that there is work going on to make > > stacktraces available in the browser. Could that mechanism be reused > > to implement what I need ? (In plain Java I get the stacktrace and > > find the stack element just before the trace statement). > > > David > > -- > mP- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
