On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Lex Spoon <sp...@google.com> wrote: > Do you remember, John, if we included the :: if the class type was > left off? I was thinking we could do @someMethod(??)(a,b), which is > more concise. >
I think we discussed leaving it as @::method, but I don't remember if there was any reason we needed the ::, other than clearly identifying that method is a method name and not some class. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
