> 1) Would people be interested in my proxycreator patch, for potential > inclusion into gwt core? > 2) Does request pooling sound like it's something that would be of use > in general? Is this something the gwt team would be interested in > working with?
Why did you go with the approach of patching the generator, as opposed to injecting a custom RPCRequestBuilder into the proxy object? If this use case cannot be satisfied with RPCRequestBuilder, then its API is insufficient. -- Bob Vawter Google Web Toolkit Team -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
