Yup, the svn mirror broke. We're fixing it right now.

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote:

> It was committed, and should have hit svn by now. I can't check that system
> right now, but can look in the morning if it's still wonky.
>
> On Jul 15, 2010 5:41 PM, "Konstantin Scheglov" <
> konstantin.scheg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> The most natural spot to hook in would
> >> be
> com.google.gwt.uibinder.rebind.XMLElement.consumeAttributeWithDefault(String,
> >> String, JType[]), which I believe is the only way to get the value of an
> >> attribute from the parsed XML.
> >
> >
> > Aha!
> > Yes, using XMLElement.consumeX() methods also will work and even better,
> > because of support all parsers, even custom ones (if/when they will be
> added
> > into UiBinder).
> >
> > I've implemented such approach and it seems to work.
> > So, I can post new patch (tomorrow).
> > I'm only now sure how to do this.
> > Should I wait to commit of previous patch (I don't see it yet in SVN)?
> > Or you have not committed it yet?
> > Should I post new patch as new patch set in same issue, or open new one?
> >
> >
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Ray Ryan <rj...@google.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Konstantin, I just submitted this but I'm starting to wonder about it.
> >>> There are lots of custom parsers that consume lots of attributes (e.g.
> the
> >>> various layout panel parsers). Why don't they need to call putAttribute
> >>> explicitly the way CellPanelParser did? If they do, and leaving them
> out was
> >>> an oversight, we need a more general mechanism that will just keep
> working
> >>> as new parsers are written, or this kind of mistake will plague us.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 8:49 AM, <rj...@google.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> LGTM
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for the interface on UiBinderWriter, should have done that a
> long
> >>>> time ago. I'll probably tweak it's name while submitting.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/693801/show
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Konstantin Scheglov,
> > Instantiations, Inc.
>

-- 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors

Reply via email to