On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 6:27 PM, Lex Spoon <sp...@google.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Scott Blum <sco...@google.com> wrote: > >> SGTM as far as process. >> >> Is the new linker designed to curtail extension, or to sanely encourage >> it? The existing primary linkers ended up getting extended in brittle ways. >> > > That's a good point. Let's make it a final class to start with, and open up > extension points later as issues come up. There are no known needs for > extensions at this point. >
Well, we do know there will be other linkers, and if there aren't extension points defined they will be done via cut-and-paste, which is what led to the current state we are in. -- John A. Tamplin Software Engineer (GWT), Google -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
