2011/5/26 Grzegorz Kossakowski <grzegorz.kossakow...@gmail.com>:
> 2011/5/26 Eric Ayers <zun...@google.com>:
>> Hi again,
>>
>> Can you point out any of places where you saw this assumption? The
>> last time I was mucking around with binary type names I was told not
>> to assume that $ could not appear in source names, so it might be
>> unintentional.
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> The problematic place for me is ReplaceBindings.java, lines 154-155:
>
> // Rebinds are always on a source type name.
> String reqType = type.getName().replace('$', '.');
Any comment on that one? Working-around it is possible but quite
involved. I'd love to know if I need some solid work-around or just
hack to keep me going because this will be removed upstream.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
