On 2012/06/08 17:20:06, rdayal wrote:
Yep, you're on the CLA list.
On Fri Jun 08 05:15:45 GMT-400 2012, James Horsley
<mailto:james.hors...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Just to check, was everything okay with the CLA I signed? > > On 7 June 2012 16:56, James Horsley <mailto:james.hors...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > Thanks Rajeev. Let me know if there's anything else you need with
it.
> > > On 7 June 2012 16:18, Rajeev Dayal <mailto:rda...@google.com> wrote: > > Thomas, thanks for jumping in. > > James, as Thomas said, we'll defer this to 2.5.1, but we'd
definitely like
> to get it in there, as it's an important patch. We just didn't want
to
> force this patch in 2.5.0, which is what we would have to do with
the
> current workload. > > Thanks so much for working on this. > > > On Thu Jun 07 06:23:58 GMT-400 2012,
<mailto:james.hors...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Totally agree on this needing another round. Also, hearing about the > plans for a 2.5.1 release which this could potentially be a
candidate
> for is great. > > Thanks again. > > On 2012/06/07 09:56:52, t.broyer wrote: > > On 2012/06/07 09:22:24, james.horsley wrote: > > > Thanks for all your help with the patch Thomas. Sad to hear it
won't
> make it > > > into GWT 2.5 as we were really looking to use RF with Maps
without
> having to > > use > > > a patched version of GWT built from source internally. > > > We're planning a 2.5.1 soon after 2.5. > > There are also several issues with Map support in AutoBeans
(reported
> only > > recently) which I'd like to get fixed at the same time (some of
them
> are related > > to how maps are encoded/decoded, so I'd like to have it the same
in
> both > > AutoBeans and RF; see > > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7395
for
> instance, > > which you seem to have avoided by using a slightly different > serialization path > > for keys, where String keys are encoded as "\"foo\"", vs. "foo" in > AutoBean's > > serialization). > > Finally, to be honest, I think we need at least one more round
here: I
> need some > > more time to wrap my head around it. > > > >
http://codereview.appspot.com/6132056/%3Chttps://www.google.com/url?sa=D&q=http://codereview.appspot.com/6132056/>
> > > >
I'm possibly being a bit eager given 2.5 GA only just went out but thought I'd just ping on this with regards to the 2.5.1 release that had been mentioned. http://codereview.appspot.com/6132056/ -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
