I do support Richard's idea. Am Freitag, 3. Oktober 2014 18:19:30 UTC+2 schrieb Richard Wallis: > > Can you not define an interface for HistoryImpl so that we can replace it > while you still keep your implementation private? > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Jens <jens.ne...@gmail.com <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> Ok so gwt 2.7 is going to provide pushstate functionality so we don't >>> need the 3rd party libraries? >>> >> >> It only uses pushState internally and does not expose any API for it. So >> no, you would still need a library or JSNI to use pushState. >> >> -- J. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7e26d28b-15cf-497d-b8ae-1deaaf2d7c51%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/7e26d28b-15cf-497d-b8ae-1deaaf2d7c51%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/306ab4f6-f0d8-4d56-b889-21f4531b6550%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
