@Christian: 1. What does gwt-jscore do?
2. as Ray Cromwell suggested in this post "In general, native DOM elements == no $wnd prefix, JS libraries loaded in host page == $wnd prefix " This means your JQueryElement <https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jquery/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jquery/client/api/JQueryElement.java> should be: @JsType(prototype = "$wnd.jQuery") public interface JQueryElement { ... } What do you think? Am Donnerstag, 30. Oktober 2014 16:27:17 UTC+1 schrieb Cristian Rinaldi: > > I have been testing JsInterop for a while, and is very promising ... > The issue of static functions is something I have asked, and we have to > wait Java support 8 and the new JSNI too. > @confile, if you want to look at a couple of projects on which I am > working: > > > - gwt-jscore <https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore> > - gwt-jquery <https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jquery> > - gwt-playground > <https://github.com/csrinaldi/samples-of-gwt/tree/master/gwt-playground> > > > probably when Elemental 2.0 has been implemented, gwt-jscore will not be > necessary. > > gwt-used-playgroud use jscore and a simple implementation of gwt-jquery, > with suport of Event and Promise... > > For create object I use for the moment a Factory Class, and for emulate > static method, by example, Object.observe, I have a two interface, see: JS > Factory Class > <https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/factory/JS.java> > > and Browser Factory Class > <https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/factory/Browser.java>, > if > not the best solution, but until this all implemented works for me. > > Hope you helps. > > > El sábado, 4 de octubre de 2014 12:18:08 UTC-3, confile escribió: >> >> Consider the following static JavaScript function: >> >> THREE.ImageUtils = { >> loadTexture: function (url) { ... } >> >> } >> >> The way I use to create the static function with JsInterop is to create >> an interface for ImageUtils and then create an inner abstract class >> MyStatic which contains the static methods implemented with JSNI. >> >> Here is an example of the above class: >> >> @JsType >> public interface ImageUtils { >> >> public static abstract class MyStatic { >> >> public static native Texture create(String url) /*-{ >> return new $wnd.THREE.ImageUtils.loadTexture(url); >> }-*/; >> } >> >> } >> >> >> I don't think this is the best solution. Is there a better way to handle >> static functions with JsInterop? >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/eca70063-0bfa-4725-b959-bb5692c81545%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
