On Monday, December 11, 2017 at 9:39:52 PM UTC+1, Peter Donald wrote: > > Hi, > > Have you considered the javax.json API?
No, just like I didn't consider org.json. > There are some parts that may > not be able to be directly translated but from memory it should mostly > work. The "advantage" is that it is a standard that is starting to > gain traction and will likely be present in lots more APIs as more of > the EE stack adopts it. The "disadvantage" is that the api is a bit > more primitive and it evolves slowly. It could probably be done with > just @JsOverlay methods and a few adapter classes. I think it would mostly involve adapter classes (JsonObject extends Map, JsonArray extends List; so they cannot be implemented as native types) > Another > disadvantage is that it is an immutable/read-only API. > It's actually not: JsonObjectBuilder and JsonArrayBuilder allow constructing values. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/5dbdcd27-d141-4b07-935e-4ec5e994ddc1%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
