+1 for dropping support for all IE versions (8-10)
Jens schrieb am Mittwoch, 6. Oktober 2021 um 10:22:50 UTC+2:

> I think the gecko permutation has very little to no special treatment of 
> IE 11 and there are some bugs reported because of that. So there isn't much 
> to deprecated for IE 11. 
>
> Personally I only use safari, gecko permutation and define safari as 
> fallback permutation. In addition I use some code to check runtime vs 
> compile time user agent and if they are different display a warning that 
> some things might not work. That warning basically triggers for any exotic 
> user-agent and any IE below 11.
>
> Dropping all IE permutations (8-10) should be totally fine I guess. 
> Especially because the new, smaller GWT modules only care about IE 11 (if 
> at all). gwt-dom for example has only two checks for safari and everything 
> else is treated the same.
>
> -- J.
>
> ManfredTremmel schrieb am Montag, 4. Oktober 2021 um 11:07:11 UTC+2:
>
>> Am Donnerstag, 30. September 2021, 18:49:56 CEST schrieb Colin Alworth: 
>>
>> > So, is there any objection at this time to dropping what remains of 
>> IE8, 
>> > IE9, and IE10 support from GWT? Then, we can reevaluate IE11 at some 
>> later 
>> > date, for GWT itself? Various migrated GWT modules have focused their 
>> > efforts on well-supported browsers, and are likely to only support IE11 
>> by 
>> > accident anyway. 
>>
>> Let's drop the IE-Permutations. IE11 uses the gecko permutation, so no 
>> need to 
>> drop it. In my newer projects, I only use safari permutation for all 
>> browsers, 
>> so even dropping all browser specific permutations wouldn't affect me. 
>>
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2804ef85-5111-45b8-9341-024b61694025n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to