We need to invent a TCP/IP compatible cluestick on the double!
On Sep 18, 6:36 pm, "Ian Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Rob Coops <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Always fun to read a Reinier comment to pretty much anyone.
>
> > Seriously Reinier though you usualy are quite correct with your facts and
> > knowledge you might try to leave the baseball bat on the filed and not bash
> > someonce head in for a change. I would not be surprized if people are scared
> > to post here for they fear the wrath of the ever present Reinier.
>
> I don't know--Reinier was away from this group for a while and I
> wasn't the only one that missed him enough to say so publicly. I've
> even experienced the pointy end of Reinier's missives and lived to
> tell the tale. I think he's a valuable contributor and security is,
> as you mention below, one of those subjects that needs tough love.
>
> > On the other hand I am still looking forward to the day when fingers will
> > automaticaly be broken every time a developer codes a well known and
> > described security flaw into their application.
>
> Indeed. A small tasering might be a good idea, too.
>
> Ian
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
