l,

Your rhetoric is soaring so high I can't understand a word of it.
What is it you want?  Can you use plain English?

Walden

On Oct 16, 4:39 pm, lkcl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> folks, hi,
>
> as you've no doubt seen, i mentioned in the announcement of pyjamas
> 0.3 that there's a parallel project, pyjamas-desktop, which is a port
> of pyjamas to run as a desktop widget set and framework.  it works ...
> incredibly well, thanks to webkit.
>
> the way it's done is by some glib / gobject bindings onto webkit.
> this non-trivial bit of work resulted in being able to manipulate the
> DOM model in an identical - and i do literally mean function-for-
> function, concept-for-concept, property-for-property, attribute-for-
> attribute and object-for-object identical - fashion to that which you
> would "normally" use javascript for.
>
> over 300 glib objects are auto-generated, and over 1,500 "gdom"
> functions are auto-generated (thank god.  it'd be madness to write
> them by hand) from the webkit IDL files, and, once the API was
> available, thanks to the auto-generator, it was - incredibly - a
> matter of 4-5 days for a port of pyjamas to the desktop to be
> completed.
>
> the nice thing about the glib bindings to webkit is that they're in c,
> and there are as many "interface generators" to wrap glib objects to
> other programming languages as there are major programming languages.
>
> .... oh look, here's a screenshot of someone who is advocating the
> java gobject bindings, and _guess_ what example they're showing?
> webkit!!
>    http://picasaweb.google.com/cgwalters/Screenshots#5230352024470678530
>    http://java-gnome.sf.net/2.x
>    http://live.gnome.org/JGIR/SampleCode
>
> so.  i have a question for you.
>
> with webkit providing literally _perfect_ corresponding functionality
> to that which is provided by a web browser, and with the shiny new
> webkit-glib bindings sparkling and glittering in that magpie-
> attractive fashion, _and_ with pyjamas-desktop showing that it's
> perfectly feasible, what's to stop the GWT Widget set from becoming a
> cross-browser _and_ cross desktop widget set and framework?
>
> l.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to