We are using TeaVM for the javascript port of Codename One and have been very happy with the results. One thing that TeaVM offers that nobody else in the Java->Javascript realm is thread support. Performance is also very good, and the creator (Alexey) is quite responsive to support requests.
Steve On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 7:43 AM, Satguru Srivastava <ssatg...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, I recently came across TeaVM (http://teavm.org/) > Similar to GWT but unlike GWT, which compiles Java Source Code to > JavaScript, TeaVM compiles Java Byte Code to JavaScript. > It is an interesting approach. > The big advantage to this approach is that you do not have to create and > maintain your own compiler. > You ride on the back of the JavaC compiler and can take advantage of the > optimizations, latest changes and updates made to the compiler. > So while GWT is working on supporting Java 8 , TeaVM already provides > support for that. > > What do you guys think? > What are the pros/cons of this approach ? > > > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "GWT Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Steve Hannah Web Lite Solutions Corp. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
