On second though I think I agree with Salvador.  Looking closer at the
Codehaus plugin it should do the job job in the long term.

On Apr 15, 1:20 am, Salvador Diaz <diaz.salva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >  Who agrees that having a solid,
> > > feature complete Maven plugin from Google would increase adoption of
> > > GWT faster than anything?
>
> I think the google team is focusing in the basics first, and that
> implies not being able to deliver all the goodies at the same time, I
> think it all fits rather nicely with the agile mantra: deliver early,
> deliver often. If they tried delivering the Eclipse plugin (and all
> other popular IDEs' plugins for that matter) and the maven plugin at
> the same time they deliver the actual product (GWT) they couldn't
> possibly deliver that often. Not to mention that they don't seem to be
> maven people, they're rather ant users, so why not leave it to the
> community, in true open source spirit, to build the tools they need,
> they even help out when there's something that doesn't work nicely
> with our tools (one of the issues resolved in 1.6 was specifically
> adressed to allow a nicer maven integration), I don't think we can
> possibly ask for more cooperation from them.
>
> > Maybe file an enhancement request?
>
> I totally agree with Jeff, if you think a great maven plugin would
> help with adoption, why not try the one from the mojo project (which
> is quite nice by the way) and report any issues that you find with it.
> I don't think we can have a more official plugin than that (after all,
> they're the maven experts, not google )
>
> Cheers,
>
> Salvador
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to