Hi

Here are my .gwt.xml and HTML, both are generated by webAppCreator except
that I added two source paths in .gwt.xml:

----------------- Start of .gwt.xml
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE module PUBLIC "-//Google Inc.//DTD Google Web Toolkit 1.6.3//EN" "
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/tags/1.6.3/distro-source/core/src/gwt-module.dtd
">
<module rename-to='shop'>
  <!-- Inherit the core Web Toolkit stuff.                        -->
  <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.User' />
  <!-- Inherit the default GWT style sheet.  You can change       -->
  <!-- the theme of your GWT application by uncommenting          -->
  <!-- any one of the following lines.                            -->
  <inherits name='com.google.gwt.user.theme.standard.Standard' />
  <!-- Other module inherits                                      -->
  <source path='client' />
  <source path='domain' />
  <!-- Specify the app entry point class.                         -->
  <entry-point class='com.dummy.shop.client.Shop' />
</module>
----------------- End of .gwt.xml

----------------- Start of HTML
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<!-- The HTML 4.01 Transitional DOCTYPE declaration-->
<!-- above set at the top of the file will set     -->
<!-- the browser's rendering engine into           -->
<!-- "Quirks Mode". Replacing this declaration     -->
<!-- with a "Standards Mode" doctype is supported, -->
<!-- but may lead to some differences in layout.   -->
<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">

    <!--                                                               -->
    <!-- Consider inlining CSS to reduce the number of requested files -->
    <!--                                                               -->
    <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="shop.css">

    <!--                                           -->
    <!-- Any title is fine                         -->
    <!--                                           -->
    <title>Web Application Starter Project</title>

    <!--                                           -->
    <!-- This script loads your compiled module.   -->
    <!-- If you add any GWT meta tags, they must   -->
    <!-- be added before this line.                -->
    <!--                                           -->
    <script type="text/javascript" language="javascript"
src="shop/shop.nocache.js"></script>
  </head>

  <!--                                           -->
  <!-- The body can have arbitrary html, or      -->
  <!-- you can leave the body empty if you want  -->
  <!-- to create a completely dynamic UI.        -->
  <!--                                           -->
  <body>

    <!-- OPTIONAL: include this if you want history support -->
    <iframe src="javascript:''" id="__gwt_historyFrame" tabIndex='-1'
style="position:absolute;width:0;height:0;border:0"></iframe>

    <h1>Web Application Starter Project</h1>

    <table align="center">
      <tr>
        <td colspan="2" style="font-weight:bold;">Please enter your
name:</td>
      </tr>
      <tr>
        <td id="nameFieldContainer"></td>
        <td id="sendButtonContainer"></td>
      </tr>
    </table>
  </body>
</html>
----------------- End of HTML


On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> Please post your .gwt.xml file & your html file.
>
> On a side note, I really do urge you to use OOPHM & Firebug - it'll
> help you track down this bug 100x faster because you'll be able to see
> the CSS rules that are being applied to the element & which are
> override each other.  That'll let you see if your rules are even being
> included & if they, if they're being overriden by another rule.
>
> On a side note, try adding !important to your styles.
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:15 AM, hezjing <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Thanks, Vitali.
> > Back to the problem, theoretically it should works by modifying the CSS
> as
> > described in the DecoratorPanel Javadoc, right?
> > Did I miss anything here?
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> I would recommend trunk & OOPHM mode which lets you run in hosted mode
> >> with native firefox.
> >>
> >> If that's not an option, you can try:
> >>
> >> public static native Element[] getElementsByClassName(String name) /*--{
> >>
> >> if (document.getElementsByClassName == undefined) {
> >>        document.getElementsByClassName = function(className)
> >>        {
> >>                var hasClassName = new RegExp("(?:^|\\s)" + className +
> >> "(?:$|\\s)");
> >>                var allElements = document.getElementsByTagName("*");
> >>                var results = [];
> >>
> >>                var element;
> >>                for (var i = 0; (element = allElements[i]) != null; i++)
> {
> >>                        var elementClass = element.className;
> >>                        if (elementClass &&
> elementClass.indexOf(className)
> >> != -1 &&
> >> hasClassName.test(elementClass))
> >>                                results.push(element);
> >>                }
> >>
> >>                return results;
> >>        }
> >> }
> >> return document.getElementsByClassName(name);
> >>
> >> }--*/;
> >>
> >> Element [] topLeft = getElementsByClassName("topLeft");
> >> assert topLeft != null;
> >>
> >> for (Element tl : topLeft) {
> >>  System.out.println("Found top left with background " +
> >> DOM.getStyleAttribute(tl, "background"));
> >> }
> >>
> >> rinse & repeat for the remaining corners.  Code not tested (just
> >> grabbed the native javascript from the web) so you're on your own if
> >> it doesn't work (at that point try gwtquery).
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, hezjing <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Hi Vitali
> >> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]>
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Have you used something like firebug to verify that the CSS on those
> >> >> elements is indeed correct?
> >> >
> >> > I'm not using Firefox and Firebug.
> >> > I'm testing this in hosted mode, is there an alternative way to verify
> >> > if the CSS is correct?
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> >
> >> > Hez
> >> >
> >> > >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Hez
> >
> > >
> >
>
> >
>


-- 

Hez

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to