I had no problems with it. It works beautifully. Compiling can take quite a while (even on my desktop took like 20 seconds) wheras hosted mode doesn't have the same overhead (& you can modify your code on the fly).
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:13 AM, alex.d <[email protected]>wrote: > > Firebug is a great tool - but using OOPHM??? Is it ready? Imho it's > ten times easier just to click "Compile/Browse" in the hosted-mode- > browser and your page will be opened in Firefox if it's default > browser - if not you can just copy the link and open it in FF > manually. > > hth > > On 17 Apr., 06:36, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> wrote: > > Please post your .gwt.xml file & your html file. > > > > On a side note, I really do urge you to use OOPHM & Firebug - it'll > > help you track down this bug 100x faster because you'll be able to see > > the CSS rules that are being applied to the element & which are > > override each other. That'll let you see if your rules are even being > > included & if they, if they're being overriden by another rule. > > > > On a side note, try adding !important to your styles. > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:15 AM, hezjing <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Thanks, Vitali. > > > Back to the problem, theoretically it should works by modifying the CSS > as > > > described in the DecoratorPanel Javadoc, right? > > > Did I miss anything here? > > > > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > >> I would recommend trunk & OOPHM mode which lets you run in hosted mode > > >> with native firefox. > > > > >> If that's not an option, you can try: > > > > >> public static native Element[] getElementsByClassName(String name) > /*--{ > > > > >> if (document.getElementsByClassName == undefined) { > > >> document.getElementsByClassName = function(className) > > >> { > > >> var hasClassName = new RegExp("(?:^|\\s)" + className + > > >> "(?:$|\\s)"); > > >> var allElements = document.getElementsByTagName("*"); > > >> var results = []; > > > > >> var element; > > >> for (var i = 0; (element = allElements[i]) != null; > i++) { > > >> var elementClass = element.className; > > >> if (elementClass && > elementClass.indexOf(className) > > >> != -1 && > > >> hasClassName.test(elementClass)) > > >> results.push(element); > > >> } > > > > >> return results; > > >> } > > >> } > > >> return document.getElementsByClassName(name); > > > > >> }--*/; > > > > >> Element [] topLeft = getElementsByClassName("topLeft"); > > >> assert topLeft != null; > > > > >> for (Element tl : topLeft) { > > >> System.out.println("Found top left with background " + > > >> DOM.getStyleAttribute(tl, "background")); > > >> } > > > > >> rinse & repeat for the remaining corners. Code not tested (just > > >> grabbed the native javascript from the web) so you're on your own if > > >> it doesn't work (at that point try gwtquery). > > > > >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, hezjing <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > Hi Vitali > > >> > On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Vitali Lovich <[email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> Have you used something like firebug to verify that the CSS on > those > > >> >> elements is indeed correct? > > > > >> > I'm not using Firefox and Firebug. > > >> > I'm testing this in hosted mode, is there an alternative way to > verify > > >> > if the CSS is correct? > > > > >> > -- > > > > >> > Hez > > > > > -- > > > > > Hez > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
