On 29 juin, 20:13, Paul van Hoven <paul.van.ho...@googlemail.com>
wrote:
> It is definetly the size of one single XYZ.cache.hml file. If i cannot
> split up this cache file even when using separate modules this means
> that the user has to download initially 412K? Because then the user
> had to wait quite long before he could see anything and in turn had to
> download parts of the application which he would probably not going to
> use.
>
> And with GWT 2.0 i could split up the app? After googling for runasync
> i found that this function seems to do exactly what i want. Is it
> already recommendable to use GWT 2.0 in this early stadium of
> development?
Given that Google uses it for publicly accessible services (Google
Code Documentation Reader, Google Moderator, etc.) and for Google
Wave, I'd say yes (I'd use a snapshot-* branch if I were you); but it
all depends on your release schedule.
For instance, if I were starting an app to be released after the
summer, I'd probably go with the trunk.
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
