Could you show the code that you used to test this with?

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 11:25 AM, John Ivens <john.wagner.iv...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hey, this is scary... Firefox, Netscape and Safari all error out at high
> data rates?
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 5:03 AM, lord.luki <lord.l...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi, maybe it wont be helpfull, but there si some response time testing
>> whitch i did. I was testing gwt-rpc from client to gwt embedet server
>> (Jetty). I was sending pojo object which contained 10 strings each
>> with average length 10 chars. In table below is time in miliseconds
>> for difrent lengths of arraylist containing this pojo objects. (From
>> 10 to 100 000 objects).
>> I also had to add -Xmx512M parameter for last column.
>>
>> lenght:   |   10        100     1000        10000       100000
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Fire Fox  |   18        30      120         1200        error
>> Chrome   |        10    14      68          900 24000
>> IE            |   13    40      230         3300        150000
>> Opera     |       32    47      130         1300        27700
>> "hosted" |       340    2500    25000   249000  3270898
>> Netscape|        20     47      220         2800        error
>> Safari      |  10       19      70          1300        error
>>
>> ps: yes it is 54 minutes for hosted mode :-D.
>>
>> On Sep 13, 10:37 pm, ben fenster <fenster....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >  i know that but i just wanted to know if the  performence margin
>> > considering having efficient serialization algoritem could be big
>> > enough too be worth the invesment in developing such php server side
>> > request handler
>> >
>> > i also wanted to know about shear power of request handling per
>> > second ? , i belive that php combined with apache would prove too be
>> > much stronger but i would like too hear from someone that checked it
>> > out
>> > On Sep 13, 4:16 am, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > > On 13 sep, 07:50, ben fenster <fenster....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > > have anyone checked what is the better way to comunicate with server
>> > > > performence wize rpc or RequestBuilder(using php)
>> >
>> > > It would all depend on your serialization algorithm when not using
>> GWT-
>> > > RPC; so there's no real answer to your question.
>>
>> >>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to