Heheeh... It takes a few minutes for me as well. Maybe more than 5 minutes!
What means to have many permutations? Is it bad? In terms of code, what it means? Anyway... I could take 30 minutes to compile as long as it continues to work fine for me. [], José Vicente On 18 nov, 12:20, Paul Robinson <ukcue...@gmail.com> wrote: > The javac compiles are a small fraction of the total time taken - that > you have third party stuff and common classes javac-compiled separately > is probably not very important to the time taken overall. It's the > monolithic compile to javascript that's slow. > > What is most important is the number of permutations done in the > compilation. For development, you should only have one permutation most > of the time - until you need to test on multiple browsers/languages. > > Your gwt.xml file should have something of the form: > <set-property name="user.agent" value="gecko1_8"/> > for compilation only on firefox. You can use user agents "safari", > "opera", "ie8" and "ie6". If you have a very old firefox, you can also > use "gecko". > > How many permutations do you have? > > You can also compile more quickly by using fewer optimisations if you're > using trunk or one of the pre-release 2.0 versions. The option is > "-draftCompile" on my slightly old copy of trunk. It does make the > javascript quite a bit slower though. > > As for hardware - first make sure you have enough RAM that you don't > need to use virtual memory. If it's still slow after all the above, then > a faster computer is always going to help (it made a big difference for me). > > HTH, > Paul > > > > hjo1620 wrote: > > My compiles are getting slower and slower (4 mins currently). > > It's a not a huge app, master detail input forms, grids, tabs, menubar > > and status bar, one servlet, ca 10 RPC calls. Third party grid, > > compiled separetly. Common classes in a separate project, compiled > > separetly. > > > WinXP SP3, > > AMD Athlon Dual Core, > > 2.71 GHz, > > 7200 rpm disks > > > Could someone please share a hardware setup that you are happy with ? > > Getting compiles down to at least 1 minute would be nice... > > Would a recent and decent Dell Precision model reduce the compile > > time ? > > > (I know that splitting the project into smaller parts is also part of > > a total solution, but currently I'm mainly interested in what can be > > achieved with hardware) > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=.
