I have something similar. I have this:
package com.company.pack
class A {}
package com.company.client
class B implements Serializable {
<some serializable fields>
private transient A field;
private A getA() {
return field;
}
private void setA(A val) {
this.field = val;
}
}
Both classes are JPA classes and it's only that B class has a
relationship with a non serializable A class, which the GWT client
doesn't have to know about. The rest of it, is serializable.
In this case, class A and B are in the same jar and the jar has the
sources included, but only B is in the GWT module (the client folder).
When I try to include this jar in my GWT project, I get an exception:
No source code is available for type com.company.pack.A; did you
forget to inherit a required module?
I tried putting the GwtTransient annotation to field A but the result
is the same. I think that GWT should completely ignore the classes
that are transient and its getters and setters and don't try to even
compile them.
It's a shame that, almost for every hibernate class that I have, I
have to create another class which has exactly the same fields, except
for one or two of them, and that I have to be putting all the data
from one bean to another all the time. It would be so much simple to
mark in my beans just the parts that the compiler shouldn't care
about.
On 14 ene, 14:55, Chris Lercher <cl_for_mail...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Well, it works for me. I didn't try it with TopLink - I used POJOs
> instead - but when I declare the fieldtransient, it works (according
> to the SOYC Compile Report).
>
> ----------------------
> Example:
>
> public class WantThat implements Serializable {
> privatetransientDontWantThat dontWantThat;
>
> public DontWantThat getDontWantThat() {
> return dontWantThat;
> }
>
> }
>
> public class DontWantThat implements Serializable {
>
> }
>
> @RemoteServiceRelativePath("some")
> public interface SomeService extends RemoteService {
> WantThat getWantThat();}
>
> -------------------------
>
> DontWantThat is not in my Compile Report. If I remove thetransient
> keyword, it is.
>
> Maybe there's something different with your case. Maybe something is
> accessing your "getDontWantThat()"? Circular references at least?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
