On Jan 21, 6:32 pm, Warpitaly <giorgio.dava...@gmail.com> wrote: > I there-say that ignoring fields marked as @transient should be quite > easy to implement...
If none of the gwt compiled code will access the field, it's certainly easy. But that's unlikely (you have getters and setters, right?). If some of your client code does access the field - and this can happen indirectly - the class signature will be required. But how do you know that at compile time, if you can't compile the methods that access the fields (because they would need the class signature, too)... Chicken and egg problem. Probably it can be solved, but 'easy to implement' might be an understatement.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
