@Diego: I think we have a misunderstanding here: it's just an example, what's more important: his message and explanation...
On Feb 5, 4:28 pm, Diego Lovison <diegolovi...@gmail.com> wrote: > hi.. > > @getaceres I suggest dont use @GwtTransient in your example.. if you > dont put the annotation your application will work fine ;) > > On 5 fev, 11:22, Ed <post2edb...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > Thanks for the clear example getaceres. > > I think you can come up with plenty examples that the above annotation > > idea is just too simple... It's nice ofcourse and welcome but for > > bigger app simple not acceptable.. > > > Above you already explain the problems you can have during > > compilation. > > In larger projects you often have different teams that are responsible > > for parts of the software. > > Suppose you have a team that does the backend and a team that does the > > front end. > > Suppose the front-end is using the above notation and all of sudden > > the backend team decides to refactor their persist domain model such > > that the introduce stuff that is simple not supported by GWT... > > Brrrrr... > > I don't think you want dependencies like that... Not even to think > > about the consequences for the front-end ... > > > Said that, there is another good reason to decouple these objects... > > Have a look at martin fowler his website, I can remember he having a > > nice discussion on his website about DTO's. > > Anyway: the DTO's have a completely different purpose then Domain > > objects, like the words already explain. DTO's simple transfer results > > in a fashion the front-end wants it.... > > So it's very good possible that you merge the result of several domain > > objects and send that as one DTO over the line to the front-end... > > Especially in case of large data set's this can save you a lot of > > traffic and as such creates a better user experience... Also, in case > > of different clients, you can fine tune your results for different > > clients.. > > > Probably I can come up with more examples... but I think I made my > > point...:)... > > > Myself I use dozer, I am not very font of it, but it's the best option > > I have at this moment. I have to say that I use my own patched dozer > > version: fixed some bugs that are still in it, and optimized it, like > > for for Hibernate proxy and collection usage. > > > Cheers, > > Ed > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
