If you have just a simple html page that just loads the GWT app and maybe a spinning "Loading" gif, then it makes no difference. That page is more about when you have a regular html page that happens to also load a script, that you want the script at the bottom so all the other content - images etc - will load first and be visible to the user, before loading the script.
On Apr 13, 8:59 am, Óscar Frías <ofr...@gmail.com> wrote: > But this document suggests putting scripts at the bottom of the HTML > to improve page download > speed:http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html#js_bottom > > Is this true also for GWT script ? > > Thanks, > Oscar > > On Apr 13, 3:34 pm, redlaber <vyalov.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > It makes no difference. The html-code generate the page almost > > instantly. GWT metod RootPanel.get("id") also work very quickly. > > Almost all time of page generation will take the loading of gwt- > > module. So place your gwt-application where it is more convenient to > > you. > > > On 13 апр, 13:51, Óscar Frías <ofr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Which is the best place to put the gwt script in the HTML page from a > > > performance point of view (page speed) ? > > > I mean to minimize the load time of a page that contains some HTML > > > code in addition to the GWT module. > > > > Is it better to put it at the end of the head section (immediately > > > before the </head> tag, or immediately before the analytics code) ? > > > Or would it be faster to put it at the end of the html (immediately > > > before the </html> tag) ? > > > > Thanks! > > > Oscar -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
