On Apr 18, 4:48 pm, Chris Lercher <cl_for_mail...@gmx.net> wrote: > Hi Parag, > > I would use GWT for many things, but in this case, I would probably > decide between > > - Using pure JavaScript (should usually be enough to do this.)
Why would it be better than GWT? > - Using jQuery selectors, if it gets more complex. GwtQuery gives you the same, in GWT. > - Or write a quick standalone Java App which parses the HTML (using > htmlunit, or NekoHTML directly), walk the DOM, and write it to a file. Yes, this is an actual alternative (I'd rather use htmlparser.validator.nu though for the HTML parsing) Using GWT or another JS toolkit is not the correct answer when the question is "can GWT do it?" or "is GWT fast enough?": GWT can do what JS do, and speed is mainly a browser issue. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
