(Sorry, my message was incomplete)

Ok, I see what you mean. I'm not sure about adding this feature but
maybe a better documentation about the "bad" idea of using sync
request.

Olivier

On 17 mai, 08:37, mmoossen <mmoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i completely agree with you Oliver!
>
> i said already that i think that sync-rpc is a really bad idea in this
> case. which was already addressed in detail by you and others.
>
> my point was against the spirit of the gwt team to do not give the
> developer the choice to use sync requests if he wants to.
> it is like never letting a child to cross the street alone instead of
> teaching him to watch out.
>
> what we need is better developers and the way to achieve that is to do
> mistakes and be willing to learn, and not a tool that tells you "i do
> not allow you to do that because it *might* be a bad idea"...
>
> regards,
> Michael
>
> On May 16, 9:39 pm, Olivier Monaco <olivier.mon...@free.fr> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Michael,
>
> > I'm totally disagreed with you. When you choose to answer here, you
> > choose to give a good one. When you know someone is going the wrong
> > way, don't let him going to far. Fighting against problems is not a
> > good way to learn, you also need to have references.
>
> > Please, read again the 
> > following:http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#id383614
>
> > "If you're going to answer the question at all, give good value. Don't
> > suggest kludgy workarounds when somebody is using the wrong tool or
> > approach. Suggest good tools. Reframe the question."
>
> > Regards,
>
> > Olivier
>
> > On 16 mai, 08:39, mmoossen <mmoos...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
>
> > > Despite that i wrote the patch for sync-rpc, I completely agree with
> > > kozura that in this case sync-rpc would be a bad idea.
> > > BUT, who cares? if fomba wants to use it, it is up to him, if his
> > > application is not responsive it is his problem not mine.
> > > (this reminds me the apple-adobe 
> > > conflict:http://sixrevisions.com/web-development/issues-with-apples-decision-t...,
> > > 2nd point)
>
> > > HTH
> > > Michael
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > > For more options, visit this group 
> > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group 
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to