Cool, I definitely look forward to reading the article. Thanks guys! Joe
On Aug 31, 2:27 pm, Christian Goudreau <goudreau.christ...@gmail.com> wrote: > Even better, I would declare an interface inside my view referencing only > presenters function needed and use @UiHandler. > > More informations > here:http://code.google.com/intl/fr-FR/webtoolkit/articles/mvp-architectur... > > I'm also about to publish an article on ArcBees's developer > blog<http://arcbees.wordpress.com/>in a day or two about that. > > Cheers, > > > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Sam <sambrod...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Joe, in the View interface I would provide: > > > HasClickHandlers getTextBoxForClickHandler(); > > > HasKeyUpHandlers getTextBoxForKeyUpHandler(); > > > The implementations in the View would both return that same TextBox. > > Redundant but clear. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > Christian Goudreauwww.arcbees.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
